You are here: Home / Research Initiatives / Agriculture, Resources and the Environment / Energy and Climate Footprinting / Environmental Impacts of California Tomato Cultivation and Processing

Environmental Impacts of California Tomato Cultivation and Processing

by Laura Crothers last modified Jul 26, 2018 09:14 AM
This UC SAREP study aims to help growers and processors better understand the energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of California tomato cultivation and processing.

 

 

What is life cycle assessment?


Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a comprehensive analysis method for assessing the environmental impacts and resources used throughout the full life cycle of a given product or system. LCAs consider environmental impacts at each phase of the life cycle (raw material production, manufacturing, use, etc.)


Study goals


 The goals of this study were:

      • to quantify resource use and a range of environmental impacts of producing tomato paste and diced tomatoes in California
      • to assess change in the industry over approximately 1 decade (2005 – 2015)


What was included in the study?


 Our study quantified resource use, including energy, water, and other resources, and estimates emissions that may contribute to critical environmental impacts, including global warming, ozone depletion, photochemical ozone creation, acidification, and eutrophication, for bulk tomato paste and diced tomatoes.

It included the following phases of tomato production and processing:

    1. Greenhouse production of transplants
    2. Field cultivation of tomatoes
    3. Facility processing

This analysis ended at the facility gate. It included transportation of transplants and tomatoes between phases, but it did not include packaging of final products. Researchers collected data from all three phases for both the 2005 season and the 2015 season, to track changes over time.

Environmental impacts included in study:

    • Global Warming Potential: a measure of how much energy the emission of 1 ton of gas will absorb over a given time period (usually 100 years) relative to how much energy 1 ton of carbon dioxide (CO2) will absorb.

    • Ozone Layer Depletion Potential: a measure of the potential of airborne emissions to degrade the stratospheric ozone layer, relative to trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11).

    • Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential: a measure of the ozone-forming potential of airborne emissions, relative to ethylene (C2H4).

    • Acidification Potential: a measure of the acid-forming potential of a substance emitted into the environment, relative to the acid-forming potential of sulfur dioxide (SO2).

    • Eutrophication Potential: a measure of the quantity of human-induced additions of nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen) to the environment, that can cause excessive aquatic plant and algae growth, expressed in units of phosphate (PO4) equivalents.

    • Toxicity potential for humans and for marine, terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems: a measure of the toxicity of chemicals released into the environment, relative to 1,4-dichlorobenzene (1.4-DCB), a chemical commonly used in mothballs, fumigants, and other products.

 

Key findings


 Environmental improvements in California tomatoes (2005 to 2015)

Between 2005 and 2015, environmental improvements were observed in both final paste and diced tomato products. Efficiency of energy use and water use increased substantially over this time period, calculated per kg of final paste and diced product.

Over the total 3-phase life cycle, the following efficiencies were observed:

ENERGY USE

    • Energy-use efficiency increased by 16 percent and 30 percent for paste and diced product, respectively

WATER USE

    • Water-use efficiency increased by 41 percent and 43 percent for paste and diced product, respectively

    • Water-use efficiency in processing facilities alone increased by over 20 percent for diced tomatoes (with only a small increase for paste production)

    • Widespread conversion from furrow to drip irrigation in the field drove improved water use efficiency, with over 25 percent reduction in per acre water use

YIELDS

    • Increases in per acre yields (from 41 tons to 55 tons among surveyed growers) were observed without proportional increases in input use (e.g. fertilizers and water)

ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACTS

    • Environmental impacts improved (decreased) by 5 percent to 43 percent on a per kg of product basis, depending upon measure. See tables below for details. (Although water, terrestrial and human toxicity potentials are not presented in the table, those potentials also declined).

    • Fossil fuel-based energy and water use were the two largest factors responsible for most of the environmental impact categories, with gypsum and nitrogen fertilizer use the second largest factors

Caveats: Considerations of increases in California processed tomato efficiency must be balanced with consideration of the total magnitude of impacts of the industry in California and elsewhere where inputs are produced. The total acreage of processing tomatoes increased by 12 percent between 2005 and 2015, and total harvested output increased by over 40 percent, requiring more total harvest and processing activity. In addition, per acre applications of certain inputs, including fertilizers and some pesticides, increased from 2005 to 2015. 

 

 Largest sources of environmental impacts

Across the three phases of the supply chain, the following factors make the largest contributions to the range of environmental impacts measured:

        • Diesel production and combustion
        • Natural gas production and combustion
        • Irrigation water pumping and use

 

Largest contributors to environmental impacts for each phase

Greenhouse

  • Vermiculite production
  • Natural gas production and combustion 

Cultivation

  • Electricity and diesel use for irrigation pumping
  • Fertilizer production

Processing

  • Natural gas production and combustion
  • Grid electricity production

Notably, grid electricity production, for uses across the supply chain, accounts for a significant amount of water use.

Production of pesticide active ingredients does not account for notably large impacts compared to other factors, but post-application impacts are not assessed here, due to data limitations.

 

Ways to improve the environmental performance of processed tomatoes


 

      • Invest in renewable energy generation at all three phases (greenhouse, cultivation and processing)

      • Invest in more energy-efficient irrigation pumps

      • Choose lower-GWP nitrogen fertilizers, such as urea-based products (UN32), over calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN17)

      • Monitor crop nitrogen needs and use precision application methods to prevent over-application of fertilizers

      • Choose less toxic herbicides and pesticides and use Integrated Pest Management

      • Consider alternatives to vermiculite

Uncertainty and needs for further research

  • Large variability between processing facilities and small sample size (2 facilities) point to need for more process-specific assessment within facilities to identify sources of impacts and options for improvement. Data from more greenhouse operations, especially for 2005, are also needed.
  • Field research is needed to understand trade-offs between upstream and downstream impacts of different fertilizer choices (e.g. greenhouse gas emissions in manufacturing versus ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions in field).
  • Increasing application rates of a few highly toxic pesticides and uncertainty in pesticide impacts post-application requires further research coupling LCA with chemical fate, transport, and toxicity models.
  • Better characterization of packaging waste and fate in all phases is needed to understand impacts.

Event Details

Download the Report
Study By:

UC SAREP logo

UCD Engineering logo

ASI logo

 

UC ANR logo

Funding Provided By:

Thank you to Barilla for funding this project.

ASI

One Shields Drive
UC Davis
Davis, CA
95616


(530) 752-3915